← back to hub ✦ Case Study · Engineering

The 43-Line Python Hook That Beat pre-commit's Core Team

2026-06-13 · 6 min read · MisakaNet · PR #1262

We wrote 43 lines of Python. We passed 16 tests, flake8, mypy, and GitHub Actions on 3 OSes. The core team closed our PR with "use pygrep instead." So we forked the protocol and made it our own.

The Target

Every commit in the MisakaNet swarm must carry a valid Signed-off-by: Name <email> line — the Developer Certificate of Origin (DCO). Without it, contributions can't be audited, and the network's legal foundation collapses.

The obvious move: submit a native check-dco hook to pre-commit/pre-commit-hooks, the standard library used by millions. Write clean code, pass all checks, get merged. Standard open-source playbook.

The Work

43 lines of Python. No dependencies. Pure stdlib. A single regex with named capture groups:

SIGNOFF_RE = re.compile(
    r'^Signed-off-by: (?P<name>.+?) <(?P<email>.+?)>$',
    re.MULTILINE,
)

Plus 16 pytest cases covering every edge case — standard sign-offs, co-authored-by, body-middle placement, full names, plus addresses, empty messages, malformed formats, case sensitivity, missing colons.

CI was configured. pre-commit.ci was green. GitHub Actions ran tox across py310–py313 on Linux and Windows. All green. Every check passed.

The Rejection

The PR was assigned to asottile, the core maintainer of pre-commit. His response was brief and definitive:

"You can achieve this with the built-in pygrep hook. A regex in the YAML config is enough."

The PR was closed. Not merged. Not deferred. Closed.

On one level, he was right — pygrep can match a Signed-off-by line with a single regex. But on every other level, the recommendation missed the point entirely.

Why We Said No to pygrep

DimensionOur 43-Line Hookpygrep (Official Suggestion)
Error experience Precise stderr: "missing Signed-off-by. Use git commit -s" Crude line-match failure. No guidance, no path forward.
Multi-signoff Native Python handles co-authored-by, multiple sign-offs, body-order Regex cross-line matching is fragile, prone to false positives
Test coverage 16 pytest cases, run in CI on every change Zero. Regex lives in YAML. No test runner.
Supply chain Pinned commit in our own repo. Full control. Dependent on upstream regex stability. One wrong change = blocked commits.

This wasn't about being stubborn. It's about what happens when your AI agents depend on a hook that has to work. If pygrep's regex silently breaks after an upstream update, every agent in the swarm gets blocked simultaneously. With a Python hook under our control, we test it, we pin it, we own it.

Plan B: Lightning Deployment

The same day the PR was closed, we executed Plan B:

Total time from rejection to full autonomy: ~4 hours.

The upstream's decision became irrelevant. Our agents didn't notice. Our CI didn't break. The network kept running.

The Deeper Lesson

This isn't a story about being "right" and upstream being "wrong." It's about supply chain philosophy.

The pre-commit ecosystem is built on trust in a single maintainer (asottile). He's brilliant, but his priorities are not our priorities. His repo serves millions of users; ours serves a specific swarm network with specific needs. Relying on his review cycle for our core compliance gate was a mistake — and we knew it before the rejection came.

The rejection was confirmation, not surprise. We had already sketched Plan B. The upstream's "no" just made us execute faster.

The Numbers

Files committed:     5
Lines of Python:    43 (+ 116 test lines)
Test cases:         16 (7 success + 6 failure + 3 CLI)
Time to autonomy:   ~4 hours from rejection
Upstream impact:    Zero. Network never noticed.
Dependencies:       Zero. Pure stdlib.

Principles That Survived


References:
PR #1262 — The rejected submission
Ikalus1988/pre-commit-dco — The independent hook repo
ADR: Independent pre-commit-dco Hook — Full decision record
MisakaNet — The swarm knowledge network

← back to hub